Success in High Court Condidentiality Case
Success in High Court Condidentiality Case
AIEL, UK law firm, European lawyers,english speaking european lawyers,association of european lawyers,european english speaking lawyers,English speaking, commercial law firm, legal firm, commercial lawyers, commercial law, private lawyers, business law William Sturges, solicitors london, uk solicitors, business lawyer, appeal lawyer, find a lawyer, financial lawyer, tax lawyer, property lawyer, employment lawyer, divorce lawyer, personal injury lawyer, family law, business law, international law, commercial property law, company law, insolvency, litigation and dispute resolution,residential property law,estate planning, trusts, will, probate, trust administration, powers of attorney, residential conveyancing, housing association transactionssex discrimination, race discrimination, disability discrimination, disciplinary procedures, grievance procedures, commercial contracts, intellectual property rights, employment terms, charity law
Industry News
15/08/2008
Developer told verbal agreement not legally binding
A developer was forced to pay back £2 million to a property owner after the House of Lords ruled that a verbal agreement the two parties had made was not legally binding, Propertyweek.com reported.

The resolution of the four-year dispute restored the legal principle that agreements must be in writing in order for them to be valid, lawyers for the winning side said.

A verbal agreement had been made by James Cobbe who said to Mr and Mrs Lisle-Mainwaring that he would purchase the property for £12 million if he was granted planning consent to redevelop it.

Profits from the sale of the redeveloped property would then be split between the two parties.

Whilst Mr Cobbe received planning permission for the property, the Lisle-Mainwarings wanted to renegotiate the deal.

Mr Cobbe subsequently took them to court and was awarded with £2 million in settlement.

The Lisle-Mainwarings then took the case to the House of Lords where it was ruled that Mr Cobbe was only entitled to be paid for the time and cost of getting the planning permission.ADNFCR-1805-ID-18735426-ADNFCR
 
Related Articles
06/01/2010
New business start-ups 'higher in 2009'
Last year is likely to have seen more business start-ups in the UK than in 2008, it has been suggested.
02/12/2009
Warning for businesses may raise insolvency issues
Banks are still substantially disconnected from businesses despite the efforts of the government, it has been claimed.
01/12/2009
Banks pledge to support firms as insolvency threat remains
NatWest and Royal Bank of Scotland have issued a pledge that they will do more to support small businesses.
30/11/2009
Warning to get balance right on internships
New regulation on the use of interns in firms may go a long way to avoiding undue exploitation, it has been suggested.
10/11/2009
Business start-up pledge made
More entrepreneurs may plan to start up a business following a pledge by a major bank to provide more support for those looking to set up their own enterprise.
News Archive
News Category
Commercial Property Law
Company and Commercial Law
Divorce Law
Ealing Lawyers
Employment Law
Family Law
Housing Associations
Insolvency Law
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Private Client
Residential Property Law
Westminster Lawyers
Wills
News Date
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008