| Industry News |
|
| News » Family Law » Pets to feature more prominently in divorce cases? |
|
23/09/2008 Pets to feature more prominently in divorce cases? |
|
Disputes over pets could soon become a common feature of divorce cases, if one legal separation is anything to go by.
A woman from Gloucestershire has been awarded a £50,000 maintenance package for her three horses following her divorce from her husband of 11 years.
She was also given a lump sum of £900,000 so that she can buy a piece of land large enough for the animals to graze on.
The money was given as part of a divorce package worth £1.5 million in total, the Daily Telegraph reported.
The woman's husband had argued that the needs of his estranged wife could be met with a house worth £600,000 and grazing land.
However, District Judge Michael Segal ruled otherwise, saying that the wife's love for the horses had been an integral part of the their life together, nothing that they had become a substitute for children.
Commenting on the case, family judge Mark Potter said: "During the marriage the horses played a major part in the wifes life with the consent and encouragement of the husband."
 |
| |
| Related Articles |
04/01/2010
Peak day for divorces arrives Today (January 4th) is the day of the year when the most divorce petitions are filed, it has been revealed.
|
26/11/2009
Prenuptials a "sensible" move Taking out a prenuptial agreement is a practical measure that is becoming increasingly popular in the UK, an expert has noted.
|
20/11/2009
Small claims pose cohabitation case difficulty A row between two people ending their cohabitation has ended up having the disposal of small items disputed in court, it has been revealed.
|
18/11/2009
Cohabitation law change 'bad for women' A planned law change that would provide greater inheritance rights for cohabiting couples has been attacked by head of the Bar Standards Board Lady Deech.
|
04/11/2009
Prenuptials 'must be properly drawn up' Prenuptial agreements need to be composed in the correct way if they are to carry any weight in future divorce settlements, it has been stated.
|